Sunday, October 14, 2007

What Is A Stock Index? (Part II)

Nasdaq Index

On 8 Feb 1971, an automated quotation system called Nasdaq (National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations) provided up-to-date bid and ask prices on 2,400 leading over-the-counter (OTC) stocks. Prior to Nasdaq, quotations for these unlisted stocks were submitted by the principal trader or by brokerage houses that carried an inventory. Now Nasdaq linked the terminals of more than 500 market makers nationwide to a centralized computer system. The Nasdaq Index is owned and operated by The Nasdaq Stock Market, which list mainly the technology stocks.

The Nasdaq Index, which is a value-weighted index of all stocks traded on the Nasdaq, was set at 100 on the first day of trading in 1971. It took almost 10 years to double to 200 and another 10 years to reach 500 in 1991. It hit a milestone of 1,000 in Jul 1995. As the interest in technology stocks grew, the rise in the Nasdaq Index accelerated, and it doubled its value to 2,000 in just 3 years. In the fall of 1999, the technology and Internet boom sent the Nasdaq Index into a frenzy, peaking at 5,048.62 on 10 Mar 2000.

Straits Times Index (STI)

Lastly, we come to Singapore’s Straits Times Index (STI), a value-weighted index. It was previously known as the Straits Times Industrial Index (STII). On 31 Aug 1998, the STII was renamed and ended at 885.26 points in the midst of Asia Financial Crisis. The STI is a value-weighted index constructed by the SPH, in conjunction with the SGX and a few other professionals.

Currently, there are 48 STI component stocks. In early Oct 2007, SGX announced that they are will revamp the component stocks again. Twenty-two current component stocks will be removed and four new stocks will be added in. To be eligible for entry to the new indices, a stock must have a free float - the proportion of shares available for trading by investors - of more than 15% and it must also pass a liquidity test.


Finally, have you ever think carefully what actually drives the index? If your answer is the investors, yes but what will affect these investors decision (whether they are speculators or value investors)? If you answer is corporate performance and/or market sentiment, yes but what will affect directly corporate performance and/or sentiments?

The Economy

Yes, the stock market performance, measured by various indexes is ultimately affected by the economic performance of a country or major developed countries. As such, we know that stock market is an indicator of future economic performance. When analysts, speculators and investors believe that an economic downturn is approaching, they will take one of the two actions – run or short. Either way, the stock market will clash. Therefore, as a value investor, we should study corporate performance and most importantly, the general economic performance.

“But I thought that as a true value investor, we should focus on a company long-term prospect and Warren Buffet does not dispose his stocks away during market downturn!”

Some of my friend had made such remarks to me before. If that is also your views, you are not wrong and I understand what you mean. But there is a different between Warren Buffett and a retail investor in investment management. But this is outside the scope of this article. I’ll talk about it in another article.

What Is A Stock Index? (Part I)

Many people know that we use index to measure stock market performance. So exactly what is an index? What’s the use of an index and how is an index calculated?

Firstly, an index is a basket of stocks that is use to represent broad market performance. These selected stocks are known as index component stocks. These stocks bear certain characteristics such that collectively, they can be used to measure the broad market or certain industry’s stock market performance (and sentiments).

Uses Of Indexes

1) Benchmarks portfolio performance. When you invest through a fund manager, i.e. buying a unit trust, how do you know or gauge the performance of your fund (or the fund manager)? Well, you measure it against certain related index. Therefore, if your fund manager can’t even match the index stocks, let alone talking about beating the index which is your expectation, then you might as well buy those index stocks rather than paying the fund manager.

2) Constructing index fund/portfolio. There are fund houses that introduce Index Fund to the market. This simply means that the fund manager will buy the index stock of a specific financial market and will hold on to it. This type fund is a passive fund as the fund managers do not need to manage or trade it actively. In fact, trading decision can be made through some computer model and little human decision is needed. The operation cost of an index fund is low compared to the usual actively managed funds. Comparatively, an index fund will charge a much lower commission. An Exchange-Traded Fund is also an index fund only that it is listed and traded actively by the investors. For more information on the ETF listed on the SGX, please click on the above link. The ETFs that are currently (Oct 2007) available on the SGX are:

Equities:

· CIMB FTSE ASEAN40 ETF
· iShares MSCI India ETF
· Lyxor ETF China Enterprise (HSCEI)
· Lyxor ETF Hong Kong (HSI)
· Lyxor ETF MSCI AC Asia-Pacific Ex Japan
· Lyxor ETF Japan (Topix)
· Lyxor ETF MSCI Korea
· Lyxor ETF MSCI Taiwan
· streetTRACKS® Straits Times Index Fund
· U.S. Cross-Listed ETFs (JV ETFs)

Fixed Income:

· ABF Singapore Bond Index Fund

Commodities / Precious Metals:

· Lyxor ETF Commodities CRB
· streetTRACKS® Gold Shares

3) Technical analysis. Obviously, speculators/punters/technical analysts uses index to predict stock movement. In this case, an index is simply a reflection of human beings’ current behaviour (i.e. stock market sentiments) and these analysts hope that through identifying certain pattern (that repeated over and over again), they could make profitable investment decisions that are usually short-termed. It is really about predicting investors’ behaviour. Or alternatively, if a person can read everyone’s mind, then technical analysis on indexes will not be needed.

4) Academic purpose – calculation of beta and portfolio theory studies.

Index Computation

1) Price-weighted index. In a price-weighted index such as the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the NYSE ARCA Tech 100 Index, the index is derived by summing up all the prices of the component stocks and divide by the number of component stocks. However, this divisor had to be adjusted over time to prevent jumps in the index when there is a change in the companies stocks and when there is a stock splits. A price-weighted index has the property that when a component stock splits, the split stock has a reduced impact on the average, and all the other stocks have a slightly increased impact. In a price-weighted index, proportional movements of high-priced component stocks have a much greater impact than movements of lower-priced stocks regardless of the size of the company.

2) Value-weighted (or capitalisation-weighted) index. In a price-weighted index, the size of the firm has no impact on the index. A market-value weighted or capitalization-weighted index such as the Hang Seng Index and Straits Times Index factors in the size of the company. The size of a company is measure by its market capitalisation (no. of shares issued x current share price). Thus, a relatively small shift in the price of a large company will heavily influence the value of the index.

Dow Jones Industrial Average

Charles Dow, one of the founders of Dow Jones & Co., created the famous Dow Jones Averages in the late 19th century. On 16 Feb 1885, he published a daily average of 12 stocks (10 railroads and 2 industrials) that represented active and highly capitalized stocks. Four years later, Dow published a daily average based on 20 stocks-- 18 railroads and 2 industrials. On 26 May 1896, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) was created from the following stocks:

· American Cotton Oil
· American Sugar
· American Tobacco
· Chicago Gas
· Distilling & Cattle Feeding
· General Electric
· Laclede Gas
· National Lead
· North American
· Tennessee Coal & Iron
· U.S. Leather
· U.S. Rubber

Today, only GE survived through the centuries and retained its membership in the DJIA. Now, the DJIA 30 component stocks are:

· 3M (NYSE: MMM)
· Alcoa (NYSE: AA)
· Altria Group (NYSE: MO)
· American Express (NYSE: AXP)
· American International Group (NYSE: AIG)
· AT&T (NYSE: T)
· Boeing (NYSE: BA)
· Caterpillar (NYSE: CAT)
· Citigroup (NYSE: C)
· Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO)
· DuPont (NYSE: DD)
· ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM)
· General Electric (NYSE: GE)
· General Motors (NYSE: GM)
· Hewlett-Packard (NYSE: HPQ)
· Home Depot (NYSE: HD)
· Honeywell (NYSE: HON)
· Intel (NASDAQ: INTC)
· IBM (NYSE: IBM)
· Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ)
· JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM)
· McDonald's (NYSE: MCD)
· Merck (NYSE: MRK)
· Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT)
· Pfizer (NYSE: PFE)
· Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG)
· United Technologies Corporation (NYSE: UTX)
· Verizon Communications (NYSE: VZ)
· Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT)
· Walt Disney (NYSE: DIS)



Analysis of the Dow trend since 1885 shows an annual compounding gain of 1.85%, excluding inflation. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, like most other popular averages, does not include dividends, so the change in the index greatly understates the total return on Dow stocks. I do mean greatly-- as with about 4.6% annual dividends reinvested since 1896, the Dow would be somewhere around 700,000 today!




To be continue......

Sunday, October 7, 2007

Hidden Gems - Darco Water

The Water Era

From 2002 – 2003, local stock market has a new theme - “water world”. Many water/waste treatment companies rushed into the SGX. These stocks were hot and many of their prices surged more than 100% during first day of listing. Similar to the dot.com era which I was not involved (I left the stock market temporary due to losses incurred in 1999 small bull), I was skeptical about these water companies and their high PE. The (same) question is - how many of these water/waste treatment companies are really going to make big bucks? I did not buy any of them although I applied for their IPO but didn’t get it. And as expected, few years down the road, only one company met and exceeded investors’ expectation. This is none other than Ms Olivia Lum’s Hyflux. The rest of them produced disappointing results and thus all their share prices fell into penny stock. It was only recently that this water issue revived with company such as Dayen started to produce some results (detail not available here since I never study on Dayen) plus many hot China water/waste treatment companies listed on the SGX.

I hardly study/monitor water/waste management company. This is because for those who are performing, their share prices are expensive. On the contrary, those that failed to meet investors’ expectation, their share prices are terribly cheap and stagnant. Last night, while browsing through all the listed companies, I suddenly noticed that EcoWise’s share price has surge above $0.80. I remembered that EcoWise was a penny stock and at one time worth less than 10 cents. I had been reading SGX announcement daily but I am not aware of any extraordinary news on EcoWise. I really have no clue what supported such high share price. I know the company is giving out 3 cents interim dividend, issuing rights and warrants, but these actions is insufficient to explain such high share price. I had also browsed through its interim report. Really, there is nothing to shout about. From my data source, EcoWise share price surged strongly in June/July 2007. Anyway, what really interest me is not EcoWise but Darco Water.

Darco Water – A Hidden Gems?

I also found that Darco Water share price surged to nearly 40 cents a share. Again the first question I asked is “what cause the share price to surge”? So I glanced through Darco Water’s recent announcements and I found something. It may be late but then it’s worth the effort to study in detail. Firstly, Darco Water released some significant news recently.

1) 5 Jul – Darco Water’s subsidiaries secured various projects amounting to S$11m.
2) 13 Aug – released of interim report showing improved performance (see below).
3) 24 Aug - Darco Water’s subsidiaries secured various projects amounting to S$8m.
4) 10 Sep – Darco Engineering signed MoU with the Supreme Council for the Environment and Natural Reserves, Qatar, to form a joint venture (JV).
5) 11 Sep – Darco Water secured S$40m financing from UK-based fund.
6) 26 Sep – Darco Water secured S$130m water purification projects in Pangkalpinang City, Indonesia

Although the first three announcements are important, it is no big deal. But the last three announcements caught my attention. Let’s go into the detail. Darco Water’s subsidiary has signed an MoU with Qatar government agency to set up a JV to resolve Qatar’s water and waste issues. If Darco Water finally concluded such JV, this would mean two things: 1) a significant project; 2) an important step into Middle East countries.

Next, Darco Water obtained financing from a UK investment company, “Pacific Capital Investment Management”. Darco Water will issue S$40m zero-coupon bonds to Pacific Capital. The investment company will have the option but not obligation to convert the bonds into equity. I agree that this is a vote of confidence from UK investment company on Darco Water’s future.

Then we have Darco Water’s subsidiary securing an agreement to upgrade and operate a water treatment plant with the local government of Bangka Island, Indonesia. The contract valued at approximately S$130.8m. After the upgrading, Darco Water will form a JV with the municipal water authority to operate the plant for next 20 years. You know what this means? RECURRENT INCOME!!!

In my opinion, these announcements, especially the last three serves as a basis for share price adjustment. Looking at these news, I am excited even though Darco Water’s share price is nearly 40 cents a share. This is because the fundamental has changed! Besides, I feel that current price may not be excessive. I am sure many people have regretted for locking-in profit on Hyflux when its share price surged to a dollar; it surged above five dollars subsequently. We must look at the fundamental, not just the share price. So the next thing I need to do is to determine whether current share price has taken into account all these good news. In addition, and as usual, to study Darco Water’s recent years' performance.

Financial Analysis

The following table shows Darco Water’s financial health and performance since 2004. As usual, I just punched in the figures and my Excel will do the calculation.


Revenue – since 2004, Darco water’s revenue has been growing at approximately 16.6% a year. Unfortunately, the net profit has been fluctuating. Consequently, the company’s profit margin and Returns on Equity (ROE) have also been fluctuating. With the exception of 2005, company’s ROE has not been attractive. The ROE for 2006 was only a pathetic 4.9%. My annual returns is more than 10%.

Liquidity and cash – company’s current ratio is acceptable consider that it is not an asset-heavy company. Company’s cash and cash equivalent has increased significantly mainly due to debt financing. Cash generated from operations is rather disappointing. The cash per share stands at $0.16 for the year ended 2006.

Debt - gearing topped to 31.6%. Personally, I do not consider current gearing as excessive but Darco Water really needs to translate all these projects into good profit such that high loans are justified by high profit especially the ROE. These debts will cost company above 5% interest. I would expect to see company earning ROE of above 10%.

Price – based on Darco Water’s interim report and current share price of $0.375, Darco Water currently trades at 29 times PE. This is relatively high unless we ascertained/assessd/analysed that Darco Water growth momentum is highly likely.

Yield – for a growth company, yield is not important. A growth company should in fact pump all its earnings back into business operations instead of giving it out to the shareholders. Of course, the important question is whether Darco Water is a growth stock for next few years.

Share issued – Darco Water currently has less than 200m share issued. Generally, for small and mid capitalization companies (listed on the SGX), the share issue ranges between 500m – 1b. The impact on low share issue is that firstly, Darco Water can and should issue more shares. Secondly, if Darco Water indeed reported profit growth, its shares will be “cornered”. But for fundamental investors, we can ignore this.

Price Analysis

I had collected Darco Water’ daily trading data from 26 Jun to end Sep 2007. The following is the price and volume movement.
From the chart, the dotted-circle line represent those announcements. You can see that current share price hardly takes into account all these announcements! The first announcement was made on 5 Jul but Darco Water’s share price hardly surge since July. It still hovers around $0.35 - $0.40! I believe that this was due to US subprime problem which dampened market sentiment. If I am correct, that means Mr. Market is wrong. He overlooked Darco Water’s potential by being temperamental.

If you look at the chart carefully, you will notice that Darco Water’s trading volume increased before the announcement on Qatar’s MoU. It looks like some people already knew and started to accumulate the stock. I hope that it is not insider trading.

Conclusion

In my opinion, Darco Water’s management has been aggressive in sourcing for more business projects and has been exploring new territory. Its previous financial performance is unexcited but nonetheless, financially healthy. The new project in Indonesia is exciting and the possible business opportunity in Qatar is double exciting. Should this materialized, Darco Water’s share price will surge further, all else remains contant. Notwithstanding the positive outlook, I am still worry about rising oil price and US subprime problem. As such, I will purchase a small quantity in Darco Water in hope that all these projects will be translated into profit growth. And if the stock markets really clashed, I will have the capability to average down Darco Water. At the end, what’s really important is whether if Darco Water’s management is able to form a JV in Qatar, secure more big projects and whether these projects will be translated into sustainable profit growth.

Thursday, October 4, 2007

In A Bull Market, You Can't Sell Cheaply

Sword of Damocles

Year 2007 is really a big bull year for many Asia stock markets including Singapore. The Bull Run was felt in early of the year and stretch all the way to July where US subprime woes stopped the momentum immediately. The Bull Run turned into panic selling. However, this panic lasted for about 2 months and then the bull continue the charge. In end Sep 2007, STI continue to set new historical record while the sword of Damocles is still hanging over our head. Actually there are two swords, in my opinion. One is still whether the subprime problem will escalate into an all round recession. It may take more time for full impact to be felt. The second one is the rising oil price. While oil price had triggered a few recessions in the past, somehow Mr. Market ignored this risk this time. Oil price triggered recessions occurs in:

1974 – Oil price surged to US$25 a barrel (around US$40 a barrel in today’s dollar value)
1982 – Iraq and Iran war. Oil price reached all time high of US$35 a barrel (around US$90 a barrel in today’s dollar value)
1991 – Iraq invasion of Kuwait. Oil price rise above US$30 a barrel

But now the oil price is above US$80 a barrel. If this is not a Damocles sword, what is? As such, I decided to run instead of following the stock market madness.

Contrarian Approach

In a contrarian approach, you take a different view/direction compare to the general market; people buy, you sell. Other than the problem of short-termism, I personally agree with a contrarian approach but must be use with care. I do not agree using it indiscriminately. If the economic fundamental or a company's fundamental is sound, contrarian is silly. But if overall market is shaky and still index is rising like no tomorrow, this approach make all sense. Like I always say, "do not follow the crowd". In my opinion, now is the right time to deploy this approach. I am going to cut my portfolio by 30% and keep it in the form of cash/CPF.

In early Oct 2007, I started keying in my selling orders at night through internet platform. I keyed in my sell order for Lee Metal at $0.275 a share based on the offering price at the end of the day. However, the when market re-opens the next day, Lee Metal’s opening price was actually $0.28 and subsequently surged just above $0.30. This means that people are willing to buy at a higher price than my intended selling price. Because my selling price was too low, exchange platform adjusted such that my traded price was actually done at the opening price of $0.28 a share.

And again a few years later, I keyed in my order to sell Pacific Healthcare at $0.44 a share. I love to keep Pacific Healthcare but with current market situation, I might need to get out and then come in again with good bargains. Shockingly, when market re-opens, the opening price was $0.465! Similarly, my trade was done at the opening price instead. Therefore, when market is bullish, people are willing to pay higher price and “I can’t sell too cheaply”. This phenomenon only occurs in a bullish market/stocks.

It’s a bonus to me.

Wednesday, October 3, 2007

About Land Banking

Seminars Attraction – From Time Share to Wine

Land banking - this is a pretty new investment product now available in Singapore. Personally, I never heard of land banking until the recent Invest Fair 2007. It was there that I met two friends who are consultants of Walton International. On 22 Sep 07, I was invited to attend a seminar conducted by Walton International at Le Meridien Hotel. Unlike other seminars, I was keen in this. The reason was because I really like to know more about land banking even though I may not invest right away. Knowledge equals to power. And I was invited by a friend who does not resort to hard sales tactics. Lately I received a call from a stranger who wanted to “confirm my attendance on wine seminar”. Before he goes on with his machine-gun, I held his horse. I was annoyed and asked him what he meant by “confirm my attendance” since I never heard of his company and I never apply for any wine investment seminar. I asked him how he got my number (actually this is a stupid question. Every time you filled in a lucky draw coupon, there is a price even though you may not get the prize!). He replied that his marketing department gave him the list. By acting blur, I told him that his marketing department had screwed up. I hanged up before his took the opportunity to continue with his machine-gun.

To me, this is one of lousiest method to sell, even if it comes with a lucky draw worth a million dollar. Time Share tried it many times few years ago; didn’t work on me. The time share caller continue to “up his lucky draw prizes” when I rejected his invitation. So much for the ethics and professionalism. If a product is genuinely good, the product will sell. No carrot is needed.

Land Banking

Back to land banking. This is something more interesting because, as an accounting graduate, I know that generally, land does not depreciate or we do not depreciate land. I also know a bit about hot property market and the fundamental that “万丈高楼平地起”. So I wanted to learn more. Outside the conference room, there was quite a crowd with coats and jackets. My friend and I were on simple tees and jeans. And then I saw another lady from Walton International who was the very first one to share with me on land banking. But I accepted my friend’s invitation instead so there could be potential conflict (Walton’s code of conducts for the consultants). So I tried to avoid her. The seminar was conducted by an “ang moh” (can’t remember his name and title). But he actually answered most of my questions in his presentation. I was satisfied with his presentation. The presentation was short and straight to the point.

Land banking is about buying a piece of raw land, totally undeveloped agricultural land and wait for future development. Of course, the land banking company doesn’t goes around to buy land blindly. While land is extremely scarce and expensive in Singapore, it is not that scarce in big countries like Canada or China. So a land banking company conducts thorough research before deciding to buy a plot of land. According to the “ang moh” speaker, Walton International has experts in land and property, weather and geographic plus someone with “political influence”. He said that “Preston Manning”, an ex-Canada politician, sits in their management team. I fully agree that, just like investing in China, you need helps from people with political influence. We knew many Singaporeans failed in the 90s when they launched into the untapped territory – China. Many came back without “pants” due to problems with local culture, business practices, local governors, red taps, bureaucracy etc. SM Lee who spearheaded the Su Zhou Industrial Estate also faced challenges such that he had to travel to China a few times to get it fix up. And now, finally after so many years, Su Zhou Industrial Estate is bearing food. Without helps from people with political influence, business venture in an untapped territory is no different from walking across land mines.

After the land banking company identifies a potential land, it will buy the land and offer it to the investors. My understanding is that many years ago, land banking was only available to big institution investors or high net worth individuals. But today, many companies including Walton International packaged it for retail investors. But, it is still quite costly. Investment in an acre will cost slightly below S$20,000. Investors will be issued with a title deed and enjoyed an undivided interest in a big plot of land. This is because the company can’t just sell “your acre”. It make economic and commercial sense to sell a big plot of land owned by numerous investors and spread the returns equally. The investors must have a long-term view in this type of product and wait patiently until someone to make an offer on that piece of land.

The selling opportunity arises when a private developer had the “concept plan” approved by the government. According to the speaker, from a piece of raw land to commercial or residential buildings, the profit starts from the selling of land. Property development involved additional risk and cost. So usually a land banking company does not venture into the development phase. A developer will approach the land banking company to buy over the land and the company will determine if the price quoted is attractive. If yes, then the land banking company will revert to the investors for a decision. A 60% majority vote is required to authorize the company to proceed with the selling. And then the money will be distributed back to the investors. I remember the “ang moh” speaker mentioned that Walton International will also keep less than 20% of the profit after the disposal. From his presentation, Walton International’s projects gave average annual returns of 10% to 20%.

Risk and Returns

In my opinion, the risk of this product comes from the land banking company itself and the land. Unlike stock investment or unit trust, land banking company is not regulated. In stock investment, listed companies are regulated by the SGX and MAS. For example, listed companies must issue annual report audited by external auditor and all shareholders are entitled a copy. But if we invest in an investment product through a private company, then the investors must do their research on that company. The second risk comes from the land and the followings are my FAQs.

1) Although we do not depreciate land, but what will cause a land to become a “waste land”? Perhaps earthquake or volcanoes? But I believe that this should be remote. In any case, nobody can predict such events.

2) What if after many years, still there is no concept plan or nobody wants that land? According to the speaker, their company not only research on a piece of land but secure “information” from authority on their overall planning. I think what he mean was that they buy it when the probability of near future development is very high.

3) The returns sound lucrative, 10% to 20% annual returns. If you are lucky and you get 20%, you are very close to Warren Buffett. Personally, I can’t achieve 20% annual return from stock investment, yet. But I am more interested in worse case scenario than rosy pictures. According to my friend, Walton’s worse record was returns of less than 10%, i.e. historically, their investors NEVER incurred losses from Walton’s projects. WOW!

4) What if, for some reason, an investor falls into financial hardship and need to check out immediately? Can he exit from the investment before the “selling opportunity”? According to the speaker, Walton will help to find another potential buyer. In this case, the first investor is not likely to get any reasonable returns. This is fully acceptable. In fact, if an investor wants to dispose off before the “right time”, it may also be fair that he had to sell at a reasonable discount. This is because it has been made clear that investment in land banking takes a few years. An investor must take full responsibility for pre-matured disposal.

5) I love to “buy low sell high”. So can I invest during a recession? According to my friend, the offering price is always the same, i.e. US$10,000 or C$10,000. My immediate reaction was “how can this be”? I asked my friend to check with Walton’s management on how they determine the selling price. I know how stock market and unit trust determine the selling price at any stage, but what about land banking? This was indeed a good question and my friend will revert to me once he got an answer from his management.

6) Can I study Walton International’s annual report? The objective is to understand their financial health and performance. And who know I should not buy land, I should invest in Walton instead! Unfortunately, Walton International is not listed. They have no obligation to show me their annual report.

Conclusion

In my opinion, the reason for a land banking company to offer its land to the investing public was because of capital limitation. It takes many years for a land to yield positive result and a cash inflow. But a land banking company cannot just sit on a few pieces of land and wait for an offer. By packaging it to the investors, cash will come in immediately after land procurement and then they can go on to source for more potential land. Of course it is fair that investors will share both risk and rewards. With more money, land banking company’s turnover will continue to rise. This concept is similar to mortgage-back security except that, unlike human, there is no default risk with land.

We know that when property market is hot, an investor can earn 100% returns or more within very short time. Here in Singapore, we have many such examples for prime lands. Thus I suspect that land investment can and should be highly profitable. We know that Ng Teng Fong and Lee Kah Shing become super rich by owning land. Although I do not have evident to prove my point, I suspect that the profit and commissions earned by a land banking company and its consultants are quite significant. Otherwise potential returns for the investors could have been even higher. Notwithstanding this aspect, it is indeed wonderful to have such product opening to smaller investors with potentially higher returns. In my opinion, the main research for any investor in this product should be on the reliability of the land banking company and his/her investment horizon. There is a good article on land banking at asiaone.com. If it is not there anymore, you can get it from me.

Tuesday, October 2, 2007

STI Movement In Sep 07

2009 F1 Singtel Singapore Grand Prix - 27 Sep

Life at NUS-CMC, and still happening......

Visit www.moblyng.com to make your own!